The discussions about whether Usain Bolt was wrong when he celebrated his victory the way he did are, quite frankly, very annoying.

Why is this an issue? Why can't we just bask in the young man's success and leave criticism for later?

It is not so much of a surprise to hear Americans, and other outsiders, com-plaining about his antics, but it is indeed depressing and disheartening to hear our very own Caribbean athletes speak negatively about Bolt's actions.

There has even been talk about whether the officials should move to implement a rule, barring celebrations that could be perceived to be unsports-manlike. Such an oppressive move should not even be considered, as this would infringe on one of the most basic human rights freedom of expression.

Bolt is as human as anyone else and, in a moment as special as that one was, no one is going to stop and think about how his or her actions would be viewed. The man was simply happy to see his dreams realised and his celebration - thumping of the chest and the famous 'Nuh Linga' - were just manifestations of that happiness.

We believe the man has a right to celebrate his victory, however he chooses, as long as no one is physically injured. If Bolt's celebrations offend anyone, he cannot be held liable for that. What was he do to? Walk around and offer certificates of participation to the others?

It is not his job to provide moral support for athletes who failed to perform up to standard.